| Poster Art |
 |
| Credits |
Director: Darren Lynn Bousman
Stars: Tobin Bell, Shawnee Smith, Angus Macfadyen, Bahar Soomekh
Screenplay: Leigh Whannell
Country: USA
Australian Release Date: November 2, 2006
Distributor: Hoyts Distribution
Running Time: 108 minutes |
Any horror film that gives special thanks to a real slaughterhouse in
its end credits must have something going for it. Another financial
success for Lionsgate, Saw III should please fans of the
previous two entries in this grueling trilogy. In fact, some genre pundits
and keyboard jockies have even stated that this is the sharpest saw of the
bunch. How does their enthusiasm stack up against the critical bashing Saw III has received from the mainstream press, which
benefits from objectivity, but at the same time is often guilty of not
understanding horror on its own terms?
Certainly, the involvement of creators James Wan and Leigh Whannell was
vital for maintaining character and story continuity, not to mention
filling the quota of sadistic games, mindfucks, and flying gore. No doubt
this is what devotees were hoping to see more of – full credit to
Lionsgate for not killing the golden goose by softening the approach and
going for a wider audience. When I caught the film in Melbourne on
November 2nd, the opening night crowd filled the large auditorium to about
95% capacity. As the house lights went down, the anticipation and festive
atmosphere was more electric than for any cinema release in recent memory,
including Saw II. A female friend who loves movies such
as Hostel squealed in delight when I told her a third Saw film had been released. And as we've heard, the US
opening weekend box-office revenue for Saw III topped $33
million, earning back triple its estimated budget in a matter of days.
Five minutes into the film, this hype was forgotten because everyone's
expectations had been met.
Following on from Saw II, Detective Matthews (Donnie
Wahlberg, Dreamcatcher) contemplates his predicament and
takes a drastic course of action that had the entire crowd groaning. Good
start! Meanwhile, as his police task force, led by Detective Kerry (Dina
Meyer), searches for his location, they stumble upon the human wreckage of
another Jigsaw victim. Upon closer inspection, this particular scenario
– which we see happen in one of many flashbacks in the film –
betrays a disturbing trend that raises the stakes further. The catalyst
for the escalation becomes apparent when the co-dependent relationship
between Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) aka John Cramer and Amanda (Shawnee Smith) is
explored in the central drama. A witness to their power struggles and
impending moment of truth is Doctor Lynn Denlon (Bahar Soomekh, Crash 2006, Mission Impossible III), who
is abducted and forced to keep Jigsaw's brain tumor from killing him
before his final game is played out. This time, instead of a house full of
scum and reprobates, the lone participant is a middle-aged father of two
called Jeff (Angus Macfadyen, Braveheart). This poor
grieving slob runs a gauntlet of mind-bending horrors to test the moral
strength of his character in the face of a past tragedy. More of an
Inquisition than a test, the full extent of Jigsaw's machinations can't be
known until the very end...
An ambitious climax for the series to be sure. After a sluggish first
act, the movie gets going when the parallel threads are set in motion and
doesn't let up. While the overall story hangs together well, some aspects
of it fall down under scrutiny. For example, the relationship between
Jigsaw and his female apprentice threatens to crumble into a pile of
nonsense; the revelation that Amanda might continue Jigsaw's legacy was
the weakest moment in Saw II. That being said, the
writers go to great lengths to demonstrate adequate character motivation
by delving into Amanda's insecure, self-destructive personality (as shown
by an idea last used in Secretary). In a less manic
production, you'd heckle Smith for such overacting, but in Saw
III her jittery performance keeps you on edge. On balance,
however, the acting from the cast is excellent. Tobin Bell, looking more
decrepit than he did in Saw II (if that's possible), is
effective once again in a role that must have given him bedsores for
weeks. His brand of torpid, lyrical derangement contrasts well against the
not-too-bright Amanda, who takes advantage of her mobility to show off the
impressive sets by production designer David Hackl and art director
Anthony Ianni. A flashback involving Detective Matthews doesn't quite
work, and another character is dispatched by being stupid beyond belief
(in other words, the climax would have been problematic if this person
survived). In fact, the schizo narrative could have been handled better by
returning director Darren Lynn Bousman, who probably showed his
inexperience when it came to keeping the audience up to speed with the
shifting time scales. Luckily, in the tradition of other Saw movies, the ending comes off beautifully, though with
the inevitable opening for another sequel.
Now, let's talk about the gore, violence and sadism. There is plenty of
all three elements on offer here, as well as some female nudity which, I
might add, is totally essential to the plot. Fans of Hellraiser (present) should get a nice jolt of déjà vu
watching one grisly set piece, while the Rack device has to be one of the
most excruciation death traps conceived for a horror film. That Jigsaw
referred to it as his "personal favourite" should give anyone pause for
thought. And then there's the improvised brain surgery sequence that seems
to last for a whole reel, bringing back fond memories of similar cranial
abuse in Re-Animator, Death Warmed Up, Happy Birthday to Me, and of course The Dead
Pit. Tempting as it is, I won't spoil the other surprises waiting
in store. The splatter make-up was provided by Damon Bishop and crew,
whose credits include Silent Hill, Land of the
Dead, Resident Evil: Apocalypse, Dawn of
the Dead (2004), Jason X, eXistenZ, and the up-coming Skinwalkers.
Suffice to say that some latex carnage appears to have been trimmed to
appease the US censors. Even in its uncut form, Saw III wouldn't reach the heights (depths?) of a bona fide chunkblower –
the events don't call for it. But you could easily say that it's one of
the most violent movies of 2006.
Mainstream critics, who by and large would have been obligated to
attend preview screenings, had little patience for (a) the fact it was a
second sequel and (b) the intensity of the torture sequences. The Bunnings
Hardware medical procedure – in all its inexplicable gratuitousness
– didn't sit well with them, either. How funny is that. Personally,
I applaud this kind of horror filmmaking. These movies are repulsive,
nihilistic, ghoulish fucking nightmares from start to finish. Derivative
of Se7en and the usual suspects, true enough, but in my
opinion, they're still at the vanguard of studio fright flicks in this new
millennium.
As for the prospect of a sequel (groan), this reviewer wouldn't mind
another one if it had to happen, except for the uncertainty of RMIT
graduates Whannell and Wan being involved. In an interview for the Herald Sun entertainment gazette, Leigh was hesitant about the
prospect of doing a fourth movie. Based on what happens here, the
franchise could go in a number of directions. For now, enjoy this berserk
third installment, because it literally goes for the jugular.
|