|
|
|
|
| Paramount (Australia). Region 4, PAL. 1.85:1 (16:9 enhanced). English DD 2.0 Mono, French DD 2.0 Mono, Italian DD 2.0 Mono, Spanis DD 2.0 Mono. English, Spanish, French, Italian, Greek, Hebrew, Croatian, Portuguese, Slovenian Subtitles. 131 minutes |
| The Movie |
| Cover Art |
 |
| Credits |
Director: Roman Polanski
Starring: Mia Farrow,
John Cassavetes, Ruth Gordon,
Sidney Blackmore, Ralph Bellamy, Charles Grodin
Screenplay: Roman Polanski
Country: USA |
Rosemary's Baby was the
progenitor. Before The Omen, before The Exorcist, there was Rosemary's
Baby. Rosemary's Baby came out in 1968, which, when I first saw the film,
took me genuinely by surprise. The film was far
beyond its peers at that time, and in spite of the
fashion sensibilities, I thought this film actually
came about just prior to or around the release of The Exorcist, simply because it
didn't feel at all like a film of that vintage.
Visually, stylistically and thematically, there
wasn't really all that much around at that
time in particular that dealt with horror the way Rosemary's Baby did.
Based
on the Ira Levin novel of the same name, Mia Farrow
stars as the titular Rosemary, who, along with
husband Guy (John Cassavetes), move into their
first apartment together in New York City. It's
all like a dream come true for the couple, great
place, great people, but as things slowly unravel,
Rosemary descends into a deep state of paranoia,
fearing that the building's Satanic past
may have come full circle around her and focused
its attention on her yet to be born child.
The film certainly isn't your conventional
horror film, and tonally different to other occult
horror heavyweights such as The Omen (which is the closest to Rosemary's
Baby in terms of story elements and themes)
and The Exorcist, but while this
may come across initially as being rather jarring,
the film's progression makes way for an
extremely gratifying downward spiral into what
becomes easily one of the best psychological horror
experiences on film. What starts out looking like
a Doris Day film ends with one of the most quietly
disturbing finales the genre has ever put forward.
The film is nowhere near as timeless as The
Exorcist, and probably dated worse than
the original Omen, but that said,
the film's actual construction is well and
truly ahead of it's own time though there
are elements, predominantly the performances,
that make Rosemary's Baby show it's age. Word was that Roman Polanski
stayed incredibly faithful to the novel itself
and this may have been the only (and it's
debatable as to whether this really is) detrimental
factor to the whole production. Large amounts
of dialogue are fairly unrealistic, you find yourself
sitting there thinking "Who speaks like
that?!", but it's one of those instances
where the dialogue would have looked great on
paper and probably read fine in the novel. It
may also have something to do with Mia Farrow's
performance and Polanski's insistence on
using obvious, slightly over the top characters.
Mia Farrow, though captivating throughout the
whole piece, plays the part of Rosemary as though
caught in a constant state of dreaming. Farrows
airy performance early on in the piece paves the
way for a very effective descent into delusional
paranoia, and her innocence in the role leads
to a number of "Oh no" moments throughout
(though featured more prominently in the latter
half). She really shines in a scene set inside
a phone booth. Cassavetes is great as the struggling
New York actor, and pulls off some of the subtleties
extremely well. When Guy pulls away from Rosemary
after feeling the baby kicking, you can tell exactly
what's going through his head, and his performance
throughout the film is perfect. The Castavets
are also a genuinely sinister presence in spite
of their external appearances and characterisations.
The film plays out fairly predictably for the
most part. I doubt too many people expect the
film to be so light in tone early on, but once
the ball starts rolling it's fairly easy
to see where certain events are leading. There
are a number of surprising moments that keep you
guessing, and as with all films like this, it's
always fun trying to guess who's who and
how their character is connected.
Technically the film is as proficient as any.
Polanski manages to balance out the execution
of particular shots, perfectly balancing the surreal
with the mundane. The surrealistic nature of Rosemary's
dream sequence sticks out like a gaping wound,
but it works so perfectly amidst the unnerving
quiet of the shots surrounding it. The progressive
use of handheld camera techniques help heighten
the sense of paranoia and tension, creating some
truly effective (albeit some of them brief) moments
throughout the film. It's also interesting
to note that in the early stages of the film,
the handheld evokes a much more loving, happy
couple, home movie feel, but in an undetectable
manner becomes something far more sinister.
The score, while sparse is really effective,
and strangely juxtaposes what you're seeing
on screen. There are moments where the score sounds
like improvisational jazz, which one normally
wouldn't associate with a horror film score,
but it works so well. The same can be said about
the rest of the score which ranges from the romantic,
grand, sweeping orchestrals to drawn out violins
that call Bernarrd Herman's Psycho score to mind. |
| Video |
| This may have been the first thing that made me
think the film was made later than it was. For a
Sixties film, the print is really, really clean.
So many colour films from the Sixties tend to have
either over saturated or under saturated colour,
but Rosemary's Baby is perfectly
balanced. The print is also surprisingly clean for
a film nearly forty years old. There are only a
couple of shots where grain or dirt is evident,
the rest is as clean as anyone could hope for. The
film is also presented in 1.85:1 (the original aspect
ratio is actually 1.66:1) and is 16x9 enhanced. |
| Audio |
| Again, surprisingly crisp. Not completely clean,
suffering a little bit of that 'sixties/seventies
hiss', but certainly not damaged or detrimental
to the audio track itself. The only true unfortunate
here is that it's a simple mono track. |
| Extra Features |
| While the DVD is fairly light going in terms
of extras, what you do get is certainly interesting
viewing. There is a sixteen minute featurette
revealing a series of retrospective interviews
with Roman Polanski, Robert Evans (the producer)
and Richard Sylbert (the production designer),
which talks about pretty much everything that
went into the making of the film, along with the
main talking points of the feature itself. There
are also some tidbits of trivia scattered throughout,
particularly regarding the cast itself –
Jack Nicholson was actually in line to play Guy,
but for all his talents, Polanski deemed him too
sinister in appearance. This particular extra
seems to have been put together in a similar vein
as the retrospective on the abysmal Don't
Look Now.
There's also a making of documentary entitled
Mia and Roman, that was recorded largely on set
using what appears to be an 8mm camera, and featuring
narration by Roman Polanski and Mia Farrow. It's
an interesting watch for the budding film maker,
but the nature of the narration (particularly
Farrow's) is a little dry and ambling for
those simply interested in the film.
Other than that, no trailers, no galleries or
commentaries are offered. |
| The Verdict |
Rosemary's Baby truly is
a classic piece of occult psychological horror.
Ardent horror fanatics can hopefully see the necessity
for the lighter parts of the films of the film,
because the ultimate payoff is unrivalled. There
have been some imitations over the past, the most
prominent being the underrated Astronaut's
Wife, which is virtually a remake, but
is still worth watching at least once. Still neither
that, nor any others can match the final sequence
of this film. Mia Farrow, say what you want about
her, but in the last moments of this film, she really
does give probably the best performance of her life.
Splatterhounds can look the other way, because there's
no gore or violence to be found anywhere in the
film (notice how all the most effective occult horror
films manage to avoid all that?), but if you consider
yourself a true fan of the genre, you really have
to see this film. The only unfortunate thing here
is the lack of extras on the DVD, but horror fans
should be used to that by now and you can actually
pick this up for around eight bucks these days,
so it's well and truly worth the money. Perfect
film, not so perfect disc (but definitely the right
price).
Got something else to say? Spill your guts on the
Digital Retribution Message Forum! |
|
|
 |
|
|
Awesome Movie!