| Everybody knows that The Exorcist
is considered a seminal horror classic. Everyone
also knows that The Exorcist II: The Heretic
is an abortion of a sequel (and film in general).
It's fair to say then that when an largely
successful horror film has a largely unsuccessful
sequel, any sub sequential instalments in the established
franchise tend to fade away into obscurity, being
pish-poshed by fans of the genre and the general
viewing population. The number three didn't
seem to be a very lucky number in when it came to
films prior to The Lord of the Rings,
especially in the horror genre. It's a shame
then, when a truly great film becomes a victim of
circumstances beyond it's control, and such
is the case of The Exorcist III.
The Exorcist III is actually
based on William Peter Blatty's book; Legion,
a superior (though medically wordy) book which
itself is the sequel to the original Exorcist
(the book). That in mind, The Exorcist
III was both written and directed by
William Peter Blatty, as the direct sequel to
the original film. It sees Lt. Bill Kinderman,
the officer investigating the murder of Burke
Dennings during the first film, returning to investigate
a series of grisly and cryptically linked murders,
the victims all deliberately chosen. The thing
is, the killer's M.O. is identical to that
of The Gemini Killer, a serial killer who was
executed the same night as the climactic exorcism
of the original film. On top of that, the police
hid the true details of the murders during the
killer's reign in order to weed out fakes,
so no one but a select few on the force and the
Gemini knew how the murders were carried out.
While simultaneously investigating strange reports
coming from the catatonics ward and visiting his
long time friend Father Dyer in hospital, Kinderman's
attention is mysteriously drawn to a man locked
inside one of the padded cells for the psychotics…
a man who looks disturbingly similar to his long
dead best friend, Father Damian Karras.
The Exorcist III is easily one
of the most underrated horror films of the 1990's,
if not all time. Tonally completely different
from its predecessor and predominantly faithful
to the novel upon which it's based, The
Exorcist III is exactly what good sequels
often should be. There's never any point
trying to rehash the success of the original,
especially when it's as powerful as The
Exorcist, so taking characters, concepts
or ideas from that original material and pushing
them in a new direction is always a welcomed notion
in my books. The film is also visually and stylistically
different, but manages to maintain the same sense
of dread the original exuded.
The Exorcist III moves along
at a relatively slow pace which, like the original,
is likely to put particular audiences off. There
is no explicit violence or gore, in fact, most
of it is the drastic opposite (until the end at
least). Again, The Exorcist III
is a far more cerebral experience, and arguably
more so than the original. Without spoiling too
much, genre heavyweight and possibly the most
underrated actor of all time; Brad Dourif turns
in possibly the most riveting performance you're
ever likely to see in a horror film. As the Gemini
Killer, his performance is second to none and
his conversations with Kinderman (played this
time around by another fantastic actor, George
C. Scott) are some of the most simultaneously
disturbing and amazing sequences caught on film.
It's a perfect combination of fantastic
script plus fantastic actor equals pure awesome.
George C. Scott also turns in a performance that
easily surpasses Lee J. Cobb's interpretation
of the role, while also remaining oddly faithful
to the little nuances Cobb gave the character
in the original. Both actors have such a commanding
presence on screen that it's impossible
to look away, and when the two are together the
film truly shines.
The whole film is eerily still, and when certain
'things' happen you are taken completely
aback. There's one particular moment that
is widely talked about as one of the most effective
'boo' moments of all time, and it
holds up to repeated viewings. It's also
sadistically hilarious to watch others jump or
scream when it does happen. You can rest assured
however that there is only one 'boo'
moment in this film (actually there's a
second but it doesn't really count), the
rest plays more on feeding you bits and pieces
progressively and making you think. I really should
make mention of the elderly actors in this film
as they turn in some truly haunting performances,
particularly Mary Jackson who plays Mrs. Clelia
("Are you here to fix my radio?").
Blatty, already a fantastic writer, also turns
in a surprisingly good effort in his directorial
debut. His control over the visuals and subtleties
(particularly when Kinderman visits the head of
the Georgetown University church) of this film,
along with the nuances of particular characters
and actor performance really make this film a
must watch.
The score, or soundscape as it is, is perfectly
suited to the visuals, comprising largely of guttural,
demonic echoes and reverberating sounds create
a genuinely disturbing atmosphere that makes even
the smallest of moments far more harrowing than
they would be had they been accompanied by a more
theatrical score.
Unfortunately the only problem one can pick out
with this film is a serious case of studio interference.
Morgan Creek, upon realising that the initial
draft did not contain a single exorcism, demanded
rewrites and pretty much forced Blatty to make
the ending you see in the film now. It's
unfortunate because it really goes to show how
ignorant and purely money driven some of these
idiots are. Had they taken a look at the book,
which was released and optioned in 1983, they
would have realised that there were no actual
exorcism rites to be found in the book (outside
of referencing the events of the original novel),
and last minute changes wouldn't have been
enacted during filming. |
but i want to download it
how