| I don't think I need to set this one up
that much. If you don't know what The
Exorcist is (I'd be genuinely amazed
if anyone falls into this category) or have not
yet seen it, here's a brief run down.
In 1973 a film came out that caused such a stir
in cinema's that it pretty much became what
the film was known for. People were turning up
in droves to see this new film that was being
touted as the scariest movie you'd ever
see. Word was that frenzied audiences were so
shocked and horrified by what they saw that ambulances
were turning up at cinemas to deal with cinema
patrons so affected by what they were seeing that
they became physically ill. The film itself, based
on the controversial novel of the same name written
by comedy writer William Peter Blatty, dealt with
the exorcism of a twelve year old girl called
Reagan McNeil (played by Linda Blair), who is
believed to be the unwilling vessel for demonic
forces. The book was actually inspired by true
events, where a young Lutheran boy fell victim
to demonic forces and similar events transpired.
At the time, The Exorcist was
a landmark film, stirring unparalleled controversy
and simultaneously frightening and inspiring filmgoers
and makers alike across a number of generations.
Until I actually saw the film for myself, my father
would constantly reference it as one of the scariest
movies he'd ever seen, which, coming from
a man who has sat through a number of the genre's
greatest every Friday night with his older brother,
and naturally didn't frighten easily, was
certainly saying something about the effect this
film had. But that was then, and today's
horror film connoisseur has certainly had a lot
more pass before their eyes, which in turn, begs
the question: How does it stand today?
Being a horror film with serious religious undertones,
you already present a large number of people with
a very significant issue. Religious horror films
tend to have a more profound affect on an audience
depending on their personal beliefs. Your common
Western audience will have at least some religious
belief, be they tied to a particular church or
agnostic, so already you're tapping into
something that no one has concrete proof of being
either right or wrong. No one can prove that God
does or doesn't exist, and that logic also
applies to the Devil. So when you say that a film
is based largely on true events, dealing with
something that is either very real, or extremely
ambiguous to the majority of people out there,
you are going to inevitably tap into some very
deep rooted fears based on people's beliefs.
Basically, The Exorcist has the
ability to frighten people on a much more cerebral
level because while everyone knows that Freddy
Kreuger or Jason Vorhees don't exist, no
one can say either way that a demon does not.
The fear that this is actually possible is what
gave (and still gives) The Exorcist
its power.
In that sense, that cerebral sense, The
Exorcist is still as powerful as it's
ever been. So many films have tried to emulate
that fear of God and the Devil over the years
but have simply become pale imitators, falling
victim to their own special effects or just plain
terrible stories that nothing really compares
to date. Even The Exorcism of Emily Rose,
which will always draw inevitable comparison (and
is for some reason, widely touted as being a great
film) has absolutely nothing, nothing at all,
on The Exorcist. However, in
terms of it being something that is continually
scary to look at, today's audiences are
likely to find it somewhat tamer than they're
probably expecting.
A lot of people who are used to mainstream horror
don't tend to see The Exorcist
as being all that terrifying, but often these
are people looking for 'boo' moments
and cheap scares that have become an almost deplorable
'must have' for genre flicks since
Scream hit the screens. Moments
like these aren't to be found in The
Exorcist. It's not about suddenly
frightening the shit out of you and then having
a laugh at your expense, it's all about
the build up of dread and loathing that stems
from the reality of the situation and how much
belief the audience invests in what's going
on. If someone sits down to watch this expecting
to be scared witless by something jumping out
of dark corners, then you're probably going
to find The Exorcist pretty boring.
In spite of this, The Exorcist
still manages to shock audiences with a number
of memorable sequences. One that has always incited
controversy (and rightly so) involves masturbation/mutilation
using a crucifix. It's far less sexual than
a lot of reviews make it out to be, and more of
a vicious, sadomasochistic moment. The projectile
vomiting, though not as disgusting as it may seem
through the hype, is still an impacting moment
(what I think is far more effecting comes later,
where Reagan is constantly streaming this heavy,
thick vomit throughout the Exorcism). The rest
of the moments often come down to quotable moments
between one character and the demon inside Reagan.
A large part of the problem with today's
audience, compared to those of yesteryear, is
that they don't seem to handle any sort
of sexual intimations or situations with any seriousness.
A vast amount of dialogue, terrific and shocking
dialogue, loses it's impact because the
younger audiences, the ones that should be terrified
of films like this, find a twelve year old with
ugly make up screaming sexualised obscenities
hilarious. But I suppose that's the biggest
problem right there; that's all this is
to too many people, a 12 year old in ugly make
up screaming sexualised obscenities.
The drama of this film is really what sells it.
It's what makes the whole thing believable.
Linda Blair (Reagan), Ellen Burstyn (Chris, Reagan's
mother) and Jason Miller (Father Karras) were
all nominated for Academy Awards for their performances
in this film, and deservedly so too, particularly
in Ellen Burstyn's case. Linda Blair actually
took away a Golden Globe for her performance.
All the performances contributed to this film
genuinely selling the story of humanity and faith,
and what is, essentially, the story of one man
questioning both as the film unravels. The film
was also rightly nominated for the Academy Awards
in Cinematography (the film is shot beautifully,
it really is a surprise it didn't take an
Oscar for this too, Directing, Editing and was
one of the few horror films earn a Best Picture
nomination.
The film did win Best Writing and Best Sound,
and both easily make large contributions to the
success of The Exorcist. Nothing
can really come close to the sound work done on
The Exorcist. The scene where
Karras plays back the tapes of Reagan speaking
is one of the eeriest scenes I can bring to mind.
Everything you hear in this film sounds completely
real. I was amazed to hear how some of the sounds
were achieved (which is all explained in the "Fear
of God" documentary).
It's probably worth noting that this 25th
Anniversary Edition of the film was also the first
time the theatrical cut of the film had been seen
in its entirety. Up until now, the Australian
VHS circulation of the film had been snipped here
and there (notably the masturbation sequence).
Sure you have The Version You've
Never Seen Before available now (actually
replacing this release) which includes added footage,
but if you're after the true theatrical
release, you're going to have to do some
digging for this one. |