'What is the worst film you have ever
seen?'
I'm sure that many of you have been asked
this question. Horror buffs are prime candidates
for such stupid inquiries because, after all,
we do watch some pretty awful films.
Bad Films are assessed, for the most part, on
their incompetence. But it is their incompetence
which makes them both funny and entertaining.
There are a myriad of Bad Movie moments that are,
in fact, wondrous displays of ineptitude as a
surrealist art form. Take, for example, the infamous
"dummy fall" in Zombie Holocaust.
It is a defining Z-movie moment and one that has
given countless viewers a great deal of pleasure.
There are other such moments in the film that
inevitably raise a chuckle, or an eyebrow, or
both. Yet it's a Bad Film. No question about
it, the thing is terrible. And it is this paradox
that has become of grave concern to me.
Don't worry, I'm going somewhere
with this.
It's fun to point out a film's shortcomings,
to laugh at its crippling faults. This is not
an elitist pastime. This is not malicious. There
is an understanding here. We want to see another
actor forget their lines and look directly at
the camera. We want to see the strings that carry
the UFO through the air. We want to see the obviously
fake severed arm complete with suspicious looking
"hump" behind the actor's back.
Yet if such things become the very reason that
the film holds a place in our subconscious, and
if the wretched photography and laughable dialogue
and horrendous effects are instrumental to the
enjoyment that is derived, then surely that in
itself is enough to elevate the film beyond its
technical limitations. If a movie succeeds in
entertaining its audience, does it really matter
how this is achieved?
With the advent of user-friendly filmmaking
software, Bad Films such as Zombie Holocaust
have almost completely disappeared. Anyone with
access to iMovie, a digital camera with mpeg capabilities
and a whole lot of patience can unleash onto the
world whatever horrendous, epilepsy-inducing pile
of crud they want. Gone is the sense of naivety,
the belief that, hey, they tried their best. "Bad"
has become polished, aseptic and safe. The UFO's
strings have been painted out. When a film is
bad now, it is bad on a whole other level.
Which brings us to Requiem.
I am very sorry that we took so long to get here
but I really had to make the distinction between
a bad film and a Bad Film before continuing with
the review.
In this abysmal thriller from Herve Renoh, four
escaped criminals find themselves stranded at
a monastery after their car breaks down. The monastery
is abandoned except for a young female backpacker
(Julie Anne Roth), a weary old priest (Simon Eine)
and Christian, a pensive monk with a heart problem.
Christian, played by Patrick Dell Isola, acquired
his heart condition after being shot during a
bungled robbery. You see, Christian was "killed"
when he tried to protect a young girl from suffering
the same fate as her parents, namely being gunned
down in cold blood by the ferociously-hairy Marcus
(Moussa Maaskri). His efforts were in vain, of
course, as Marcus shot the little girl as she
ran toward Christian, the bullet hitting them
both in the process. His four accomplices escaped
and Christian "died" on the way to
hospital. Then, miraculously, he came back to
life. This "resurrection" exonerated
him from his criminal activities (I have no idea
how) and the fact that he ratted out his partners
probably didn't hurt either. Not wanting
to stick around and wait for his incarcerated
friends to eventually track him down, Christian
devoted his life to the Lord, accepting a life
of quiet servitude and hiding himself away in
a monastery somewhere…
I think we all know where this is going so I
won't bother insulting your intelligence
the way that this film insulted mine. 'Let's
have the criminals wear bad ass leather trench
coats and walk around in slow motion a lot because
that's never going to go out of style. Priests
with guns? Awesome! Twist endings are popular
these days so let's throw a few of those
in as well. It doesn't matter if it doesn't
make any sense because research shows that our
target audience is comprised entirely of man-children
and drug-addled Goths. Women are only interesting
when they're being sexually assaulted, or
naked, or both. Having characters yell all the
time is a great way to let the audience know what
they're feeling.'
Requiem is not the worst film
ever made. Not by a long shot. But it is a heartless
exercise in derivative filmmaking. It is self-important,
completely unremarkable and devoid of any imagination
at all. There are thousands of films just like
it, appearing on our retail shelves with terrifying
regularity. The only thing that separates them
from the rubbish that is churned out by the studio
system is their budgets. Perhaps instead of spending
the money on bitchin' firearms and sweet
explosions, Requiem should have
invested in some refurbished mannequins, preferably
ones with detachable limbs. |